Skip to main content

Table 1 Distribution of results of the total IPCAF scores among participating hospitals, Median (IQR)

From: Evaluation of the implementation of WHO infection prevention and control core components in Turkish health care facilities: results from a WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF)—based survey

Component

Score

TRH (n = 27)

UH (n = 22)

CH (n = 9)

SH (n = 7)

PH (n = 3)

Total (n = 68)

CC1

82.5 (17.5)

90.0 (15.6)

90.0 (23.8)

80.0 (45.0)

100.0 (-)

90.0 (17.5)

CC2

97.5 (10.0)

98.8 (15.0)

100.0 (12.5)

100.0 (35.0)

97.5 (-)

98.8 (13.8)

CC3

85.0 (25.0)

85.0 (30.0)

75.0 (20.0)

70.0 (50.0)

90.0 (-)

80.8 (20.0)

CC4

92.5 (17.5)

91.3 (8.1)

90.0 (26.3)

82.5 (27.5)

100.0 (-)

92.5 (12.5)

CC5

80.0 (50.9)

75.0 (48.0)

75.0 (28.0)

65.0 (80.0)

85.0 (-)

75.0 (39.0)

CC6

90.0 (10.0)

90.0 (11.3)

85.0 (6.3)

87.5 (20.0)

97.5 (-)

90.0 (11.9)

CC7

65.0 (20.0)

62.5 (39.0)

75.0 (20.0)

75.0 (15.0)

90.0 (-)

70.0 (34.0)

CC8

95.0 (17.5)

81.2 (28.8)

95.0 (13.8)

87.5 (12.5)

92.5 (-)

92.5 (20.0)

Total

672.5 (115.0)

671.3 (140.0)

655.0 (71.3)

615.0 (300.0)

735.0 (-)

668.8 (125.0)

  1. TRH training and research hospital, UH university hospital, CH city hospital, SH state hospital, PH private hospital, IPCAF Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework, CC core component, CC1 IPC programme, CC2 IPC guidelines, CC3 IPC education and training, CC4 HAI surveillance, CC5 multimodal strategies for implementing IPC activities, CC6 monitoring/audits of IPC practices and feedback, CC7 workload, staffing and occupancy, CC8 built environment, materials and equipment for IPC at the facility level, IPC Infection Prevention Control, IPCAF Infection Prevention Control Assessment Framework