Skip to main content

Low secondary attack rate after prolonged exposure to sputum smear positive miliary tuberculosis in a neonatal unit



Several neonatal intensive care units (NICU) have reported exposure to sputum smear positive tuberculosis (TB). NICE guidelines give support regarding investigation and treatment intervention, but not for contact definitions. Data regarding the reliability of any interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) in infants as a screening test for TB infection is scarce. We report an investigation and management strategy and evaluated the viability of IGRA (T-Spot) in infants and its concordance to the tuberculin skin test (TST).


We performed an outbreak investigation of incident TB infection in a NICU after prolonged exposure to sputum smear positive miliary TB by an infant’s mother. We defined individual contact definitions and interventions and assessed secondary attack rates. In addition, we evaluated the technical performance of T-Spot in infants and compared the results with the TST at baseline investigation.


Overall, 72 of 90 (80%) exposed infants were investigated at baseline, in 51 (56.7%) of 54 (60%) infants, follow-up TST at the age of 6 months was performed. No infant in our cohort showed a positive TST or T-Spot at baseline. All blood samples from infants except one responded to phytohemagglutinin (PHA), which was used as a positive control of the T-Spot, demonstrating that cells are viable and react upon stimulation. 149 of 160 (93.1%) exposed health care workers (HCW) were investigated. 1 HCW was tested positive, having no other reason than this exposure for latent TB infection. 5 of 92 (5.5%) exposed primary contacts were tested positive, all coming from countries with high TB incidences. In total, 1 of 342 exposed contacts was newly diagnosed with latent TB infection. The secondary attack rate in this study including pediatric and adult contacts was 0.29%.


This investigation highlighted the low transmission rate of sputum smear positive miliary TB in a particularly highly susceptible population as infants. Our expert definitions and interventions proved to be helpful in terms of the feasibility of a thorough outbreak investigation. Furthermore, we demonstrated concordance of T-Spot and TST. Based on our findings, we assume that T-Spot could be considered a reliable investigation tool to rule out TB infection in infants.



Tuberculosis (TB) exposure is a recognized risk in health care settings. Data regarding transmission within neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are scarce. Newborns are particularly susceptible to TB infection and disease [1], especially the risk of disseminated disease, with potentially fatal consequences, is increased. Therefore outbreak investigations require special attention [2]. However, standardized protocols regarding contact definition are lacking. The NICE Guidelines offer direction regarding investigation management and the required interventions after exposure [3]. They recommend tuberculin skin test (TST) as well as any interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) as a diagnostic tool in their algorithm. Generally, T-Spot is considered to be more sensitive than Quantiferon in immunosuppressed population [4]. As cell-mediated immune response in children, especially among those younger than 5 years of age, is still developing, and because the T-Spot can be performed with a smaller volume of blood, the T-Spot is the preferred diagnostic tool [5]. Nevertheless, few data exist regarding the performance of any IGRA as an investigation tool for TB infection in infants and children below 5 years of age and the results are more often reported as indeterminate compared to adults [6].


We report a prolonged exposure to a sputum smear positive miliary TB and a potential strategy of investigation management after exposures in a NICU. In an outbreak investigation, we assessed secondary attack rates of infants, health care workers (HCW) and other primary contacts. In addition, we evaluated the technical performance of IGRA (T-Spot) and the concordance of its results with TST at baseline investigation in this large cohort of infants.

Case description of the index patient

A 24-year-old HIV-negative pregnant woman, originally from Guinea, with a history of cough and vaginal bleeding for over 2 weeks, was admitted to the obstetric ward. Because of suspected amniotic infection syndrome, a Caesarean section had to be performed with 24 3/7 weeks of pregnancy and the preterm neonate was admitted to the NICU for further treatment and care.

After delivery, the mother suffered from persistent abdominal pain and cough. Two months later, an emergency laparoscopy had to be performed because of the suspicion of a tubo-ovarian abscess. Intraoperative situs showed amber colored fluid collection and adhesions. Swabs from the fluid for Ziehl–Neelsen staining, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture were negative for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) complex. Tissue biopsy revealed a non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation. Finally, a CT-scan of the abdomen and thorax, performed after 3 months of further illness, disclosed the suspected diagnosis of a miliary tuberculosis. Ziehl–Neelsen-staining of the sputum showed acid-fast bacilli, PCR for M. tuberculosis complex DNA was positive and culture showed growth of Mycobacterium africanum. At the time of diagnosis, her newborn was already discharged from the NICU.

Retrospectively, a PCR from placental tissue was negative, but the PCR of the abdominal tissue biopsy taken during the laparoscopy was positive for M. tuberculosis complex DNA. In summary, the miliary TB was diagnosed with a delay of 5 months. Critical anamnestic facts, such as the patient's country of origin, were not considered, and the initial diagnostic workup was inappropriate.

The mother’s visits were not uniformly documented regarding time and duration. However, the documentation confirmed that she visited her preterm born infant regularly, mostly daily. During her visits, she wore a surgical face mask only when a of cough was obviously present.


Study design

We performed an outbreak investigation in a NICU of a tertiary care university hospital, assessing secondary attack rates as well as concordance of T-Spot and TST in infants after prolonged TB exposure. The neonatal department comprises an intensive care and an intermediate care unit with a maximal capacity of 36 beds. Intensive care patients, as well as infants in transition to intermediate care, are cared for in two not fully separated large units with a total capacity of 20 beds (closed incubators as well as open cots). The outbreak investigation took place before the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, face masks were not routinely used.

As there is neither a consensus case definition in the scientific literature nor a definition for infants considered as contacts, the ad-hoc outbreak management team, consisting of experts in infection prevention and control, neonatology and pediatric infectious diseases, established definitions for case and contacts and steered the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions (see Table 1).

Table 1 Definitions of contacts and interventions used

Exposure investigation


Index patient

As the mother was Ziehl–Neelsen smear positive (+++), M. tuberculosis complex DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive and culture positive for M. africanum, we defined her as the index patient. Regarding the exact course of the mother’s disease, we assumed that she was contagious from the onset of respiratory symptoms, even before giving birth. Her infant was not considered as an index case, but as severely exposed.


According to the Swiss national TB guidelines and European Consensus Guidelines, every immunocompetent person being in contact with an sputum smear positive TB case for more than 8 h is considered exposed [7, 8]. Immunosuppressed persons and children aged 12 or younger generally are at high risk for acquiring tuberculosis [7,8,9,10]. Therefore, at the study hospital, immunosuppressed persons and children aged 12 or younger are considered exposed when having shared the same room with the index patient, regardless of the duration of exposure.

In addition, we followed the European consensus board, who decided that a relevant risk of exposure should be evaluated for persons who have been in contact with the index patient during the period of 3 months before diagnosis and initiation of treatment of the index patient [7]. In case of a confirmed incident TB infection, the investigation period would be expanded back to the onset of symptoms of the index patient. But, as exposed infants are at increased risk of TB infection or disease, and infections of HCWs could have a huge impact on infection control and hospital acquired infections, we did not apply this temporal criterion to infants and HCWs. We decided to investigate all exposed infants and HCWs from the onset of symptoms of the index patient over a period of 5 months (see Table 1 “investigation period”).

  1. (a)


Although the mother’s visits to the NICU were not uniformly documented regarding time and duration, she visited her infant mostly daily for 1–2 h over a period of 3 months. Therefore, every child hospitalized simultaneously in the NICU with the index patient’s child for more than 24 h was regarded as a contact.

  1. (b)

    Health care workers.

HCW with close nursing contact to the index patient as well as HCW working in the patient’s room or with her infant for more than 8 h in total were considered as contacts.

  1. (c)

    Primary contacts other than infants or healthcare workers:

    • Family members: The husband, the newborn and the other children of the index patient, aged 3 and 5 years, as well as the social worker accompanying the family were considered as contacts.

    • Relatives of contact infants: Taking into account the index patient’s visits, every visiting relative of an infant hospitalized for more than 4 days during the same period as the child of the index patient, was assumed to be a contact.

    • Other patients: Every patient sharing a room with the index patient during her two inpatient-stays (Caesarean section and laparoscopy) for more than 8 h was considered a contact.

Diagnostic and therapeutic interventions


Infants hospitalized in the NICU

The miliary TB of the index patient was diagnosed about 6 weeks after discharge of her newborn from the NICU. Since most of the infants were released from the NICU at the time the index patient was diagnosed, we informed parents of the contact infants, as well as their pediatricians, by mail and asked the parents to participate in exposure investigation of their infant. In case of exposure, NICE Guidelines recommend an immediate start of isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis and its reevaluation after 6 weeks along the results of performed TST or IGRA. As in our case, the time of exposure was at least 6 weeks prior, we did not start INH prophylaxis. T-Spot and TST were performed at baseline in every contact infant. For the purpose of reassurance, we conducted a second TST in all infants at the chronological age of 6 months (except the infant reached this age already at the time of the first investigation). We did not perform a routine second T-Spot as we wanted to avoid inconvenience of phlebotomy in small children. In case of a positive TST we would have performed a T-Spot for comparison. Further diagnostics were planned in case of clinical signs consistent with an active TB disease or a positive TST or T-Spot. Since the diagnostic value of an X-ray is limited, we did not perform chest X-rays.

Family member infants

For the index patient’s newborn child and for the two siblings, we assumed an intensive and permanent exposure until the time of diagnosis of the index patient. Therefore, the time criterion (of 6 weeks) could not be applied. TST and T-Spot was performed in all three children. To exclude active tuberculosis safely, chest X-ray and gastric lavage was performed in all three children. According to Swiss guidelines, all three siblings received isoniazid prophylaxis immediately after the mother was diagnosed and active TB was ruled out in the newborn. After 8 weeks, we repeated TST in all three children and stopped the INH prophylaxis due to the persistent negative results.

Primary contacts other than infants

We followed the Swiss national TB guidelines and performed TST or IGRA (Quantiferon), depending on previously existing result, 8 weeks after the last exposure. A chest X-ray was performed in case of a positive result. Isoniazid or rifampicin prophylaxis was established in case of a newly diagnosed latent TB infection (LTBI).

Microbiological assays

T-Spot. TB (T-Spot, Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK) and Quantiferon TB Gold Plus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (QFT®Plus, Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) were performed according to the prescriptions of the manufacturer. TST was performed according standard procedures [7].

T-spot and its viability

T-Spot is a variant of the Enzyme-linked immune Spot (ELISpot) technique that is designed for the detection of effector T-cells in heparinized patient blood stimulated by ESAT-6 (Panel A) and CFP-10 (Panel B). The test enumerates individual ESAT-6 and CFP-10 specific cells by measuring secreted interferon-γ (IFN-γ) around the effector T-cells by an ELISA resulting in a spot. A control tube (NIL) without antigens is performed to detect nonspecific cell activation, i.e., secretion of IFN-γ around the cells without any antigen stimulation. A positive control containing PHA confirms viability and functionality of the T-cells and must reach > 20 spots. The test is interpreted as positive or as negative if the number of spots of Panel A (ESAT-6) and/or Panel B (CFP-10) minus the number of the spots of the NIL control reveals ≥ 6 (positive) or ≤ 5 spots (negative), respectively.

The T-Spot results were compared to TST results at baseline (at least 6 weeks after last exposure).

We performed descriptive statistics to evaluate the viability of T-Spot in infants.

Quantiferon TB gold plus ELISA

QFT®Plus is an in vitro diagnostic test using peptide cocktails to stimulate cells in heparinized blood. Detection of secreted IFN-γ by ELISA is used to identify in vitro responses to those peptide antigens that are associated with M. tuberculosis complex infection. QFT ®Plus has two distinct tubes: TB-Antigen Tube 1 (TB1) with M. tuberculosis complex antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 that are stimulating mainly CD4 helper T-cells and TB-Antigen Tube 2 (TB2) with an additional set of peptides that stimulate cytotoxic CD8 cells. An additional tube (MITOGEN) with (PHA) stimulating T-cells unspecifically to produce IFN-γ is added as a positive control. Results > 0.5 IU/ml are required as a positive control. An additional NIL tube with heparinized blood without any antigens is added as negative control. After an incubation of 16 h the 4 tubes are centrifuged (15,2000g) and the supernatants are tested with the QFT®Plus ELISA. The results of the 4 tubes are compared with a standard curve of IFN-γ (IU/mL). Values of TB1-NIL or/and TB2-NIL > 0.35 are considered positive according to the manufacturer. According to in-house standards, we considered results of > 0.35 IU/mL but < 1 IU/mL as inconclusive and results ≥ 1 IU/ml as positive.


Exposure investigation


Overall, 90 infants were exposed according to the contact definition used. The median gestational age in weeks was 32 6/7 (range 23 6/7–41 5/7), and the median weight at birth was 1950 gr. At the time of the first test, all infants had a postmenstrual age of at least 37 weeks. We conducted baseline TST and T-Spot in 72 of 90 (80%) exposed infants. Five (5.6%) infants died on the NICU of other causes than TB and six (6.6%) were lost to follow. Four (4.5%) infants were still hospitalized at the NICU so exposure investigation was done during hospitalization and seven (7.8%) infants were investigated elsewhere (TST only, no report of positive tests). Baseline TST and T-Spot were negative in all cases, except one, in which T-Spot was inconclusive.

17 (18.9%) infants had a chronological age of 6 months at the time of the first investigation. In these children, no follow-up investigation took place. In 51 (56.7%) of the 54 (60%) remaining infants, we performed a follow-up TST at the age of 6 months. Again, all infants were tested negative. Three (3.3%) infants were lost of follow-up before the second investigation.

Health care workers

Out of the 160 exposed HCW, 139 (86.9%) had a negative Quantiferon. 11 (6.9%) were lost to follow up. 10 (6.3%) HCW were diagnosed with latent TB, 5 of them were however already tested positive before. Out of the five newly diagnosed HCW for latent TB, two originate from countries with a high TB incidence, in two HCW’s Quantiferon were repeatedly inconclusive and one HCW showed a positive Quantiferon result. A normal chest X-ray and the lack of symptoms excluded an active TB disease. The HCW received a prophylactic therapy for latent TB with rifampicin for the duration of 4 months.

Primary contacts other than infants and health care workers

  1. 1.

    Family members: of the four family members tested for latent TB, only the husband of the index patient was tested positive. As the index patient, the husband originates from Guinea, which is considered a country with high TB high incidence. The time and duration of the latent infection of the husband cannot be specified.

  2. 2.

    Relatives of exposed infants: 86 relatives of infants were exposed, 80 (93%) were tested, 6 (7%) were lost to follow up. Four (4.7%) relatives were diagnosed with latent TB, all coming from TB high burden countries. The precise moment of TB infection in these cases is therefore unclear.

  3. 3.

    Other patients: two other exposed patients received TST or Quantiferon, none of them showed a positive result.

The exposure investigation is summarized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Summary of results of outbreak investigation

Secondary attack rate

In total, one of 342 exposed contacts was newly diagnosed with latent TB infection. This corresponds to a secondary attack rate of 0.29%. Counting only the tested contacts, 1 of 304 was newly diagnosed with latent TB infection, corresponding to a secondary attack rate of 0.32%.

Viability of T-spot in contact infants

In our baseline investigation, all infants showed a negative TST and a concordant negative T-Spot. All infants except one responded to PHA (positive controls revealed > 20 spots).


This report describes a TB exposure and outbreak investigation of a sputum smear positive miliary TB on a NICU with low secondary attack rate. To our knowledge, no report with an adult as index patient suffering from miliary TB in this setting has been published. In addition, this report shows good technical performance of the T-Spot in infants with concordant negative results of T-Spot and TST at baseline investigation in all tested infants in our cohort.

Index patient and contact definitions

In the past years, several NICUs have experienced and reported exposure to sputum smear positive tuberculosis [2, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. In most reports, the index patient is a neonate suffering from congenital TB [2, 11,12,13, 20,21,22,23] although exposures through HCW are also described [12,13,14, 22, 23]. NICE Guidelines give support regarding investigation and treatment intervention, not though for contact definitions [3], leading to substantial differences in most reports regarding clinical presentation of the index patients and management protocols. Decisions regarding contact definitions and management protocols rely on expert opinions, as shown along a review of the literature we performed which is summarized in Table 2 [2, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].

Table 2 Summary of reviewed literature

In the here reported investigation, the mother was considered as index patient. The infant of the index patient had not shown symptoms consistent with a congenital TB, the placental PCR was negative for MTB complex, the result of the infant’s gastric lavage and the TST up to 6 months of age were all negative and therefore the diagnosis of a congenital and postnatal TB infection was unlikely.

Given the large number of infants in the NICU, the delayed diagnosis of the index patient’s disease, and the unexact documentation of the mother’s daily presence, we decided that every neonate, hospitalized more than 24 h, was exposed. The TB transmission risk for infants is minimal, not negligible though, and the potential harm of TB disease life threating [24]. This justified our, complex and time intensive outbreak investigation. In terms of feasibility and accurateness, our expert definitions proved to be useful in this thorough outbreak investigation.

Therapeutic interventions

A considerable issue is the lack of evidence regarding the indication for the administration of isoniazid as a chemoprophylaxis in children exposed to an adult sputum smear positive TB index case. As no randomized controlled study showing the benefit of this intervention has been performed, this decision is mostly based on the observation that this chemoprophylaxis is well-tolerated by the infants [11, 15, 20, 22, 23] but still lacking good evidence for prevention of TB disease.

The Swiss national guidelines recommend chemoprophylaxis with INH to all children 5 years or younger to prevent TB. In case of negative TST or IGRA 8 weeks after exposure, the prophylactic therapy can be stopped [7]. Similarly, the NICE Guidelines recommend INH prophylaxis but in case of negative TST and IGRA for 6 weeks after exposure only [3].

Given that at the time of diagnosis of the index case and start of the investigation, at least 6 weeks passed since the infant’s exposure of the NICU, we decided to waive the application of INH prophylaxis to all infants apart from her newborn. As a constant exposure until the diagnosis of the index patient was present in case of the index patient’s newborn and of the siblings, we followed the Swiss national guidelines as well as the NICE Guidelines and started isoniazid prophylaxis up to the second negative TST 2 months later.

Retrospectively, the repeated negative TST results of all hospitalized infants 6 months of age, where TST is considered to be reliable, support this approach. Likewise, the fact that the index patient’s newborn and her siblings were not infected and only one possible transmission among the exposed HCWs was observed, is reassuring.

Secondary attack rate

Generally, transmission to newborns after exposure in medical facilities, seems to be rare: to date only three cases of infection [11, 18] and few cases of positive TST without signs of active disease have been reported [15, 17, 20, 21]. Crockett et al. found contaminated respiratory equipment to be the most likely source for the nosocomial transmission, whereas Steiner et al. found a nurse being the index patient having transmitted the disease to two infants [11, 18]. The secondary attack rate in this study including pediatric and adult contacts was 0.29% and 0.32% respectively in exposed versus tested individuals. No infant was diagnosed with TB infection. The here reported low secondary attack rate is consistent with earlier studies, where transmission is rarely described [2, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].

There are different possible reasons for the low secondary attack rate observed in our investigation.

First, our index patient suffered from miliary TB with pulmonary involvement but not cavitary TB of her lungs. The literature regarding the contagiousness of patients suffering from miliary TB is scarce, but it is generally accepted that HIV TB co-infected patients presenting with a similar clinical picture, correspond to a paucibacillary infection and therefore are considered at low risk of transmission [25]. The fact that the mother as index patient did not even infect her newborn infant, as well as the two swiss-born and therefor non BCG-vaccinated siblings, where close and intense contact must be presumed, supports the hypothesis of low infectiousness of miliary TB.

Second, the mycobacterium identified in our index patient, was M. africanum. A recent study shows a reduced transmission rate for lineages of M. africanum compared to lineages belonging to M. tuberculosis [26]. Of note, M. africanum belongs to M. tuberculosis complex. Therefore, diagnostic tools as MTB complex PCR, TST and IGRA have similar diagnostic accuracy for M. africanum as for M. tuberculosis [27].

Third, the presumed risk of nosocomial transmission by HCWs is higher than by infants or relatives because of close and usually long-lasting contact between HCW and the exposed persons [2, 11,12,13,14,15, 20,21,22]. Our investigation, with only one potential transmission in the HCW cohort, and no transmission in the infant cohort, supports this hypothesis.

Fourth, the modern NICU environment with an active ventilation (6-7times/h) reduces the risk of airborne infections. Yet, Ahn et al. and Perry et al. report a low percentage of TST conversion in exposed infants in modern NICUs, showing persistent risk of transmission even in highly modern environments [15, 17]. This therefore justifies our decision regarding the contact definition of the infants.

One HCW showed a possible transmission. In this HCW the first IGRA was quantified with TB1/TB2 Antigen Nil 3.76/3.39 IU/mL. Interestingly a TST as a routine test 4 weeks before this IGRA was reported negative. This situation led to the speculation of a possible booster phenomenon. A booster phenomenon questions the reliability of a positive IGRA if following to a previous TST, due to the possibility of false positive IGRA result driven by tuberculin stimulation [28]. However, these phenomena are mostly seen in patients with previously positive TST, only few reports show a booster phenomenon in patients with a previous negative TST [29]. A second IGRA, conducted 19 weeks later showed a weaker stimulation (TB1/TB2 Antigen Nil 1.1/1.65 IU/mL), supporting the hypothesis of a booster phenomenon. In addition, as the TST was performed after constant exposure over 2 months, in case of transmission, a positive TST could have been expected at the time of investigation. Nevertheless, transmission could not be completely ruled out and diagnosis of LTBI was possible, therefore the HCW was treated for LTBI with rifampicin for 4 months.

Viability of T-spot in contact infants

Current literature comparing the performance of IGRA (Quantiferon and T-Spot) and TST to identify TB infection in young children reveals limited evidence and conflicting results [5, 30,31,32,33]. Studies focusing on performance of T-Spot in comparison to TST may show discordant results with TST positive and T-Spot negative cases. However, the authors conclude that these conflicting results are based on overestimation of diagnosing LTBI using TST as a diagnostic tool. False positive TST cases, not seen in our cohort, are thought to result from recent BCG vaccination or non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) exposure or infection. Yet, limited cell mediated immunity may lead to false negative T-Spot results, especially in children younger than 5 years. Given the absence of a gold standard for diagnosing LTBI in children, the validation of test performance is measured by progression to active TB disease although being a rare outcome. In this respect, a study published recently, evaluating the performance of IGRAs in children younger than 5 years, showed evaluable results in 98% of children and concluded that IGRA could be a useful tool to evaluate children at risk for TB [5]. The invalid rate was determined to be less than 1.8% for children younger than 12 months. In addition, a strong correlation between positive T-Spot results and well-recognized risk factors (e.g. burden of TB in the population) could be proven [5].

In line with this latest data, all infants in our outbreak investigation showed a negative TST and a concordant negative IGRA (T-Spot). All blood samples from infants, except one, responded to the positive control of IGRA (T-Spot), demonstrating that cells are viable and react upon stimulation by PHA. This implies the assumption that even premature infants may have reached a certain maturity of the immune system by the chronological age of 6 months, otherwise no positive control would be expected. These results may support previous literature, establishing T-Spot as a technically operational test in infants [5, 34]. Although our results should be eventually confirmed with samples from infants with TB infection, positive TST and a positive T-Spot.

General remarks and challenges in TB diagnosis

The extent of our outbreak investigation shows the enormous consequences of a delayed TB diagnosis. Our case demonstrates the difficulty of TB diagnostics nowadays. Including diagnostic clues (such as patients country of origin), the accurate application of available tests and their correct interpretation is essential for a proper and prompt diagnosis of TB and, at the same time, represent a great challenge due to the investigator-dependence.

The development of simpler and faster point of care tests would certainly help to prevent such delays in diagnosis.


This investigation has several limitations. Given the limited data, contact definitions and management, as well as the protocol of our outbreak investigation were based on consensus opinions. We followed the NICE Guidelines as closely as possible (applicable).

We could not observe any proven transmission in our NICU cohort of infants, therefore the actual diagnostic accuracy of the T-Spot compared to TST cannot be verified.


This investigation highlights the low transmission rate of sputum smear positive miliary TB, even in a highly susceptible population such as infants in a NICU. Our expert definitions and interventions proved to be useful in terms of feasibility of a thorough outbreak investigation. The repeatedly negative TST results retrospectively support the approach to waive INH-prophylaxis. Furthermore, we demonstrated concordance of negative T-Spot and TST results in infants. Based on these findings, we assume that T-Spot could be considered as a reliable investigation tool to rule out TB infection in infants. Further studies are needed to confirm the performance of T-Spot in TB infected infants.

Availability of data and materials

All authors had full access to the data.



Neonatal intensive care unit




Interferon gamma release assay


Tuberculin skin test




Health care workers


Polymerase chain reaction


Mycobacterium tuberculosis




Latent tuberculosis infection


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Enzyme-linked immune spot


  1. Burk JR, Bahar D, Wolf FS, Greene J, Bailey WC. Nursery exposure of 528 newborns to a nurse with pulmonary tuberculosis. South Med J. 1978;71:7–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winters A, Agerton TB, Driver CR, Trieu L, O’Flaherty T, Munsiff SS. Congenital tuberculosis and management of exposure in three neonatal intensive care units. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:1641–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Turnbull L, Bell C, Child F. Tuberculosis (NICE clinical guideline 33). Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2017;102(3):136–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Auguste P, Tsertsvadze A, Pink J, Court R, McCarthy N, Sutcliffe P, et al. Comparing interferon-gamma release assays with tuberculin skin test for identifying latent tuberculosis infection that progresses to active tuberculosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed A, Feng PJI, Gaensbauer JT, Reves RR, Khurana R, Salcedo K, et al. Interferon-γ release assays in children <15 years of age. Pediatrics. 2020;145(1):e20191930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Starke JR, Byington CL, Maldonado YA, Barnett ED, Davies HD, Edwards KM, et al. Interferon-γ release assays for diagnosis of tuberculosis infection and disease in children. Pediatrics. 2014;134(6):e1763–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoch OD, Barben J, Berger C, Böttger EC, Egger J-M, Fenner L, Helbling P, Janssens J-P, Doser AK, Mazza-Stalder J, Neuner-Jehle S, Nicod L, Ritz N, Matthias SZ. Tuberculosis in Switzerland. Handbuch Tuberkulose Lungenliga. 2019.

  8. Erkens CGM, Kamphorst M, Abubakar I, Bothamley GH, Chemtob D, Haas W, et al. Tuberculosis contact investigation in low prevalence countries: a European consensus. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(4):925–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO. WHO Global tuberculosis report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez L, Cords O, Horsburgh CR, Andrews JR, Acuna-Villaorduna C, Desai Ahuja S, et al. The risk of tuberculosis in children after close exposure: a systematic review and individual-participant meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395:973–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Crockett M, King SM, Kitai I, Jamieson F, Richardson S, Malloy P, et al. Nosocomial transmission of congenital tuberculosis in a neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1719–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mouchet F, Hansen V, Van Herreweghe I, Vandenberg O, Van Hesse R, Gérard M, et al. Tuberculosis in healthcare workers caring for a congenitally infected infant. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:1062–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saitoh M, Ichiba H, Fujioka H, Shintaku H, Yamano T. Connatal tuberculosis in an extremely low birth weight infant: case report and management of exposure to tuberculosis in a neonatal intensive care unit. Eur J Pediatr. 2001;160:88–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher KE, Guaran R, Stack J, Simpson S, Krause W, For KD, et al. Nosocomial pulmonary tuberculosis contact investigation in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:754–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn JG, Kim DS, Kim KH. Nosocomial exposure to active pulmonary tuberculosis in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43:1292–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nania JJ, Skinner J, Wilkerson K, Warkentin JV, Thayer V, Swift M, et al. Exposure to pulmonary tuberculosis in a neonatal intensive care unit: unique aspects of contact investigation and management of hospitalized neonates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:661–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perry A, Angoulvant F, Chadelat K, De Lauzanne A, Houdouin V, Kheniche A, et al. Contage tuberculeux néonatal en maternité: dépistage et évolution d’une cohorte de nourrissons exposés. Arch Pediatr. 2012;19:396–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steiner P, Rao M, Victoria MS, Rudolph N, Buynoski G. Miliary tuberculosis in two infants after nursery exposure: epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory findings. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;113:267–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Isaacs D, Jones CA, Dalton D, Cripps T, Vidler L, Rochefort M, et al. Exposure to open tuberculosis on a neonatal unit. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42:557–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grisaru-Soen G, Savyon M, Sadot E, Schechner V, Sivan Y, Schwartz D, et al. Congenital tuberculosis and management of exposure in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:1062–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee EH, Graham PL, O’Keefe M, Fuentes L, Saiman L. Nosocomial transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a children’s hospital. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9:689–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee LH, LeVea CM, Graman PS. Congenital tuberculosis in a neonatal intensive care unit: case report, epidemiological investigation, and management of exposures. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:474–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Laartz BW, Narvarte HJ, Holt D, Larkin JA, Pomputius WF. Congenital tuberculosis and management of exposures in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23:573–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Basu Roy R, Whittaker E, Seddon JA, Kampmann B. Tuberculosis susceptibility and protection in children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(3):e96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Swaminathan S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Narendran G. HIV-associated tuberculosis: clinical update. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(10):1377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Asare P, Asante-Poku A, Prah DA, Borrell S, Osei-Wusu S, Otchere ID, et al. Reduced transmission of Mycobacterium africanum compared to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in urban West Africa. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;73:30–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Handbook on tuberculosis laboratory diagnostics methods in the european Union - Updatd 2018, p. 81–89.

  28. Van Zyl-Smit RN, Pai M, Peprah K, Meldau R, Kieck J, Juritz J, et al. Within-subject variability and boosting of t-cell interferon-γ responses after tuberculin skin testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:49–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi JC, Shin JW, Kim JY, Park IW, Choi BW, Lee MK. The effect of previous tuberculin skin test on the follow-up examination of whole-blood interferon-γ assay in the screening for latent tuberculosis infection. Chest. 2008;133:1415–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nicol MP, Davies MA, Wood K, Hatherill M, Workman L, Hawkridge A, et al. Comparison of T-SPOT. TB assay and tuberculin skin test for the evaluation of young children at high risk for tuberculosis in a community setting. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Girit S, Ayzit Atabek A, Şenol E, Koçkar Kizilirmak T, Pekcan S, Göktaş Ş, et al. Screening for latent tuberculosis in children with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: comparison of tuberculin skin and T-SPOT tuberculosis tests. Arch Rheumatol. 2020;35(1):20–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mandalakas AM, Highsmith HY, Harris NM, Pawlicka A, Kirchner HL. T-SPOT. TB performance in routine pediatric practice in a low TB burden setting. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37(4):292–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shimizu H, Mori M. Usefulness of the combination of tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assay in diagnosing children with tuberculosis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2017;243(3):205–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaensbauer J, Young J, Harasaki C, Aiona K, Belknap R, Haas MK. Interferon-gamma release assay testing in children younger than 2 years in a us-based health system. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39(9):803–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


There is no funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RP and MK run the outbreak investigation and wrote the article (shared first authors), SK supervised the outbreak investigation and contributed to the article, HS contributed to the article, SR contributed to the outbreak investigation and the article, RZ supervised the microbiological assays and contributed to the article, CR contributed to the outbreak investigation and the article, BZ contributed to the outbreak investigation, DB contributed to the outbreak investigation, JF and CB supervised the outbreak investigation, contributed to and finalized the article (shared last authors). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxana Pop.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our research project does not fall within the scope of human research act (HRA). Therefore, an authorization from the swiss ethics committee was not required.

Consent for publication

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published or submitted for consideration elsewhere. All authors contributed significantly to the manuscript (detailed contribution see below) and the final version has been approved by all authors.

Competing interests

There are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pop, R., Kaelin, M.B., Kuster, S.P. et al. Low secondary attack rate after prolonged exposure to sputum smear positive miliary tuberculosis in a neonatal unit. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 11, 148 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: