Table 2 Results of a desk review exercise to determine the status of antibiotic residues in milk in India
Study authors | Study area | Test analyses procedures (number of samples) | % Positive |
|---|---|---|---|
Kalla et al. [47] | Selected coastal districts of Andhra Pradesh | Delvo test (n = 300 raw milk) | 7 (penicillin); 5 (tetracycline); 6 (oxytetracycline) |
Kumarswamy et al. [69] | Thrissur | Microbial Inhibition Assay (n = 165) | 8 (antibiotic residues) |
Charm Assay (n = 14) | 21 (tetracycine) | ||
Charm Assay (n = 14) | 28 (Beta lactam | ||
Charm ENRO (n = 14) | 21 (Enrofloxacin) | ||
Nirala et al. [70] | Bihar | HPLC (n = 250) | 1.2 (Enrofloxacin) |
Lunden [48] | Assam | Charm Rosa | 88 (Neomycin, Streptocmycin) |
22.8 (Sulphonamide) | |||
2.9 (Beta lactams) | |||
2.3 (Chlorampenicol) | |||
2 (Macrolides / Gentamycin) | |||
Lejaniya et al. [71] | Thrisssur | Antibiotic test kits (n = 50) | 12 (Beta lactam) |
2 (Tetracyclines) | |||
Gaurav et al. [72] | Punjab | Ridascreen competitive enzyme immunoassay (n = 133) | 13.5 (Tetracycline) |
Dinki and Balcha [67] | Guwahati city | n = 120 | 23.3 (type not specified) |