Skip to main content

Table 2 Culture source, clinical diagnosis, and outcome among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex cases

From: Molecular epidemiological analysis and risk factors for acquisition of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter cloacae complex in a Japanese university hospital

 

CREC (n = 39)

OR (95% CI)

p

CPEC (n = 20)

Non-CPEC (n = 19)

Culture source

 Sterile site

2

3

  

  Blood

1

2

0.46 (0.007–9.51)

0.605

  Abscess

1

0

 

1

  Vascular graft

0

1

 

0.487

 Non-sterile site

18

16

  

  Sputum

11

4

4.40 (0.94–25.0)

0.048

  Peritoneal fluid (not punctured)

2

4

0.43 (0.03–3.46)

0.407

  Urine

1

3

0.29 (0.05–4.02)

0.342

  Bile

1

2

0.46 (0.007–9.51)

0.605

  Oral swab

0

1

 

0.487

  Stool

2

3

0.60 (0.04–5.96)

0.661

Clinical diagnosis

 Colonisation

11

7

2.06 (0.49–9.17)

0.341

 Infection

9

12

  

  Pneumonia

5

2

2.76 (0.38–33.1)

0.407

  Peritonitis

1

5a

0.15 (0.003–1.60)

0.092

  Pyelonephritis

0

3

 

0.106

  Bacteremia

1

2a

0.46 (0.007–9.51)

0.605

  Cholangitis

1

0

 

1

  Vascular graft infection

0

1

 

0.487

  Abscess

1

0

 

1

Outcome

 Required intensive care unit stay in the 7 days after positive culture

10

7

1.67 (0.40–7.48)

0.523

 Died at the end of the 30-day evaluation

1

2

0.46 (0.007–9.51)

0.605

  Among sterile site positive culture

0

1

  

  Among non-sterile site positive culture

1

1

  

 Died during hospitalisation

3

2

1.48 (0.15–19.9)

1

  Among sterile site positive culture

1

1

  

  Among non-sterile site positive culture

2

1

  
  1. aOne case had peritonitis with bacteremia
  2. Note. OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, CREC Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex, CPEC Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter cloacae complex