Skip to main content

Table 5 Attitudes towards the implementation of a measurement system of infections in ICUs by income category, as reported by ICU doctors and nurses in 2015

From: Poor adherence to guidelines for preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI): results of a worldwide survey

 

Middle income countries (14 countries)

High income countries (27 countries)

N = 836

N = 2414

Agree strongly/agree

Disagree/disagree strongly

Agree strongly/agree

Disagree/disagree strongly

%a

SEb

%a

SEb

%a

SEb

%a

SEb

To what extent do you agree with the following comments

 If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it

81

2.0

3

0.7

80

1.5

9

0.8

 Monitoring of CLABSI related measures stimulates quality improvement

96

2.0

1

0.3

91

1.5

1

0.7

 These data can be used against me

21

1.0

55

1.0

24

0.8

52

1.4

 CLABSI-related data in my ICU (if any) are reliable

74

2.0

2

0.2

68

1.5

6

0.6

 I am willing to implement, or support, a CLABSI data collection system

92

2.0

1

0.1

88

1.5

1

0.1

 Clinical diagnosis of CLABSI is difficult: this makes measurement systems unreliable

40

1.9

24

1.0

27

1.2

44

1.4

 There is a difference between a definition of CLABSI for reporting, and a diagnosis of CLABSI for treatment

54

2.1

12

0.4

47

1.4

23

1.1

  1. aAbsolute numbers are not reported because percentages are weighted estimates
  2. bStandard Error