- Oral presentation
- Open Access
O007: Lesser and lesser – the impact of small volumes in hand disinfection on quality of hand coverage and antimicrobial efficacy
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control volume 2, Article number: O7 (2013)
With some alcohol-based hand rubs a volume of 1.1 mL is recommended per application but it is unknown if such a small volume is sufficient to cover both hands and if it fulfills current efficacy standards.
Aim of our study was to determine hand coverage of three hand rubs (one gel based on 70% ethanol, one gel based on 85% ethanol, one foam based on 70% ethanol) applied with various volumes (all products: 1.1 mL, 2 mL, 2.4 mL, 1 push and 2 pushes; only foam product: 1.1 mL foam, 2 mL foam, 2.4 mL foam).
Fifteen subjects applied each product, supplemented with a fluorescent dye with each volume. Quality of coverage was determined under UV light. The efficacy of the three hand rubs was determined according to ASTM E 1174-06 and ASTM E 2755-10. The hands of 12 subjects per experiment were artificially contaminated with Serratia marcescens and the products applied as recommended (1.1 mL for the products based on 70% v/v ethanol; 2 mL for the product based on 85% w/w ethanol). The log10-reduction was calculated per product.
A volume < 2 mL yielded a high rate of incomplete coverage (76% - 87%), a volume ≥ 2 mL revealed better results (18% - 40%). There was a significant difference between the five volumes used with all hand rubs (p < 0.001; analysis of variance) but not between the three hand rubs themselves (p = 0.442). Application of 1.1 mL of the hand rubs based on 70% ethanol yielded a log10-reduction of 1.85 or 1.60 log10 (ASTM E 1174-06) and failed the US FDA efficacy requirement. Application of 2 mL of the hand rub based on 85% ethanol reduced the contamination by 2.06 log10 (ASTM E 1174-06) and fulfilled the US FDA efficacy requirement. Similar results were obtained according to ASTM E 2755-10.
Our data indicate that hand rubs based on 70% ethanol and recommended with a volume of 1.1 mL per application are not suitable to ensure complete coverage of both hands and do not fulfill the current ASTM efficacy standard requirements. Infection control practitioners should try to ensure patient safety by not reducing the volume of hand rub required for adequate for hand disinfection.
Disclosure of interest
G. Kampf Employee of Bode Chemie GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, S. Ruselack Employee of Bode Chemie GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, S. Eggerstedt Employee of Bode Chemie GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, N. Nowak Employee of Bode Chemie GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, M. Bashir: None declared.
About this article
Cite this article
Kampf, G., Ruselack, S., Eggerstedt, S. et al. O007: Lesser and lesser – the impact of small volumes in hand disinfection on quality of hand coverage and antimicrobial efficacy. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2, O7 (2013). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-O7
- Small Volume
- Patient Safety
- Infection Control
- Serratia Marcescens
- Complete Coverage